Estimated reading time: 8 minutes
In Ontario, a landlord serving a guideline rent increase has no legal obligation to explain it. The Form N1, served within the required 90-day window, is sufficient. The provincial guideline exists precisely so that annual increases are predictable. They are also indexed to inflation, and understood by both parties without negotiation.
Where communication becomes relevant, and where how you handle it starts to matter, is in two specific situations. These are above-guideline increases, where tenants have legitimate grounds to question the basis, and long-term tenancies where a close landlord-tenant relationship makes a personal heads-up a reasonable gesture of respect, not a legal requirement.
This article addresses both, and the important distinction between them.
Guideline increases: serve the notice, keep it professional
For a standard guideline increase, the process is straightforward. Calculate the allowable percentage using the provincial rent increase guideline. Complete the Form N1 accurately, and serve it at least 90 days before the increase takes effect. That is the full legal requirement.
No explanation is owed. No justification is required. The guideline is a published, publicly available number set annually by the province, tenants have access to it and are generally aware of how it works. A properly served notice is professional, complete, and sufficient.
Where landlords sometimes create unnecessary friction is by over-explaining or over-apologizing for a routine, lawful increase. Phrases like “I’m so sorry about this” or “I hate to do this” signal that the increase is somehow excessive or negotiable when it is neither. A clean, professional notice delivered on time is the right approach. Nothing more is needed.
The one exception worth noting is a genuinely close personal relationship between a landlord and a long-term tenant. In those cases, a brief informal heads-up before the formal notice arrives can be a natural and respectful gesture, not because the law requires it, but because the relationship warrants it. The key is keeping that conversation clearly separate from the legal notice. Also, it is important to be careful not to blur the line between a personal relationship and a professional one. Once that line blurs, rent conversations become significantly harder to manage.
Above-guideline increases: where communication genuinely matters
An above-guideline increase is a different situation entirely. It requires an application to the Landlord and Tenant Board, and tenants have the right to dispute it. In this context, transparency is not just a courtesy. Instead, it is a practical tool for reducing friction, minimizing disputes, and giving the tenancy the best chance of continuing through a more significant financial change.
Above-guideline increases are typically justified by extraordinary operating cost increases, capital expenditure programs, or security service costs, categories defined by the LTB. When a tenant understands what drove the application—a major roof replacement, a building-wide mechanical upgrade, a significant and documented increase in utility or insurance costs—they are better positioned to accept it as a legitimate outcome. In this way, tenants stop seeing it as an arbitrary one.
The communication here is not about softening the blow. It is about providing accurate context so the tenant can make an informed decision about whether to accept the increase, negotiate, or dispute it through the proper process. That is fair to both parties and reflects a professional approach to what is genuinely a more complex situation.
“When a landlord is applying for an above-guideline increase, context matters. Tenants are more likely to accept an increase they understand than one that feels arbitrary. If there has been significant capital work, visible improvements, or a documented spike in operating costs, communicating that clearly — before the LTB process — often resolves the situation without a hearing.”
— Victoria, Leasing Manager, LandLord Property & Rental Management
The retention question every landlord should answer first
Before deciding how to handle any rent increase, guideline or above, the more important question is whether the increase is worth pursuing at all given current market conditions.
Toronto’s rental market in 2026 has shifted materially. Vacancy is rising, rents are softening, and tenant replacement costs are running between $5,000 and $10,000 or more when four to six weeks of vacancy, professional cleaning, painting, a locator fee of one month’s rent plus HST, and re-listing at rates below the previous lease are factored in. A 2.1% guideline increase on a $2,000 unit generates $504 per year. That is a fraction of one turnover event.
For landlords with reliable, long-term tenants, the retention calculation often argues against pushing a guideline increase. This is not because it is legally impermissible, but because the financial exposure of losing a good tenant in this market significantly outweighs the annual revenue gain.
“In the current market, I often ask landlords to run the numbers before serving an increase. Four to six weeks of vacancy, a locator fee, turnover costs, and re-listing below current rates — it adds up quickly. For a tenant who pays reliably and maintains the unit well, retention is almost always the stronger financial decision.”
— Victoria, Leasing Manager, LandLord Property & Rental Management
The landlord-tenant relationship and where professional boundaries matter
One of the more common complications in self-managed properties is a landlord-tenant relationship that has become genuinely personal over time. Long tenancies, shared buildings, and frequent direct contact can create a dynamic where the professional and personal are difficult to separate.
This creates real challenges at renewal. A landlord who has become friendly with a tenant may feel uncomfortable serving a formal notice without a conversation. That instinct is understandable. But it is worth being deliberate about: a personal relationship does not change the legal framework, and rent conversations that happen informally, outside of proper notice procedures, can create ambiguity, misunderstandings, and in some cases, legal exposure.
The cleaner approach is to maintain the professional process regardless of the personal relationship. A brief, warm acknowledgment that an increase is coming is a reasonable human gesture. The formal notice still follows, on time and properly completed. The two things are not in conflict, as long as they stay clearly separate and the informal conversation does not make commitments that the legal process does not support.
Managing that balance consistently across a portfolio, or even in a single property where the relationship has become complicated, is one of the areas where professional property management adds the most value. The professional distance that a management company provides is not coldness. Instead, it is structure, and structure protects both the owner and the tenant from the ambiguity that informal relationships can create.
A note on documentation
Regardless of whether a rent increase is at or above the guideline, and regardless of what informal communication precedes it, the formal record is what matters legally. The Form N1 must be accurate, complete, and served within the required window. Any supporting documentation for an above-guideline application must meet LTB standards.
Keeping that documentation organized, accessible, and properly filed is part of managing a rental property professionally. If your current system makes that harder than it should be, that is worth examining before the next renewal cycle arrives.
Get in touch with our team to learn how LandLord manages the full renewal process, from increase notices and above-guideline applications to tenant communication and retention strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions: Rent Increases and Tenants in Ontario
No. A landlord serving a guideline rent increase has no legal obligation to explain or justify it. Serving the Form N1 accurately and within the required 90-day window is the full legal requirement. The provincial guideline is publicly available and both parties are expected to be aware of it. An explanation may be a courteous gesture in the context of a close personal relationship, but it is not a legal or professional obligation.
Above-guideline increases require an application to the Landlord and Tenant Board and tenants have the right to dispute them. In this context, communicating the basis for the increase — capital improvements, extraordinary operating cost increases, or security service costs — is a practical tool for reducing disputes and giving the tenancy the best chance of continuing. It is not legally required, but it is professionally sound.
The legal process does not change. The Form N1 must still be served accurately and on time regardless of the nature of the relationship. A close personal relationship may make a brief informal heads-up feel appropriate as a gesture of respect — but that conversation should stay clearly separate from the formal notice and should not make commitments or concessions that the legal process does not support. Blurring the professional and personal in a tenancy relationship creates ambiguity that is difficult to manage at renewal and can create legal exposure over time.
An above-guideline increase is a rent increase that exceeds the annual provincial guideline, applied for through the Landlord and Tenant Board. It is permitted in specific circumstances including extraordinary increases in municipal taxes or utilities, eligible capital expenditure programs such as major repairs or building improvements, and costs related to security services. The LTB reviews the application and tenants have the right to participate in the hearing and dispute the increase.
